LFCBY vs. ^GSPC
Compare and contrast key facts about Lifco AB (publ) (LFCBY) and S&P 500 (^GSPC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LFCBY or ^GSPC.
Correlation
The correlation between LFCBY and ^GSPC is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LFCBY vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LFCBY:
0.69
^GSPC:
1.74
LFCBY:
1.42
^GSPC:
2.35
LFCBY:
1.22
^GSPC:
1.32
LFCBY:
1.93
^GSPC:
2.61
LFCBY:
3.85
^GSPC:
10.66
LFCBY:
12.78%
^GSPC:
2.08%
LFCBY:
72.63%
^GSPC:
12.77%
LFCBY:
-25.44%
^GSPC:
-56.78%
LFCBY:
-9.67%
^GSPC:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFCBY achieves a 20.89% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 4.46% return.
LFCBY
20.89%
20.40%
17.19%
35.65%
N/A
N/A
^GSPC
4.46%
2.46%
9.31%
23.49%
13.03%
11.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LFCBY vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
LFCBY
^GSPC
LFCBY vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lifco AB (publ) (LFCBY) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Drawdowns
LFCBY vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFCBY drawdown since its inception was -25.44%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFCBY and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LFCBY vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
Lifco AB (publ) (LFCBY) has a higher volatility of 30.64% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 3.07%. This indicates that LFCBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.